public:grl_readingmemo
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:grl_readingmemo [2024/04/04 06:10] – created liang | public:grl_readingmemo [2024/04/04 07:12] (current) – liang | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ===== #01, liangz ===== | ===== #01, liangz ===== | ||
| - | range: from the title page to p8 (end of Chapter 1) | + | range: from the title page to p8 (end of Chapter 1). |
| + | |||
| + | ** NOTICE: ** please read both the scanned pictures and this memo. | ||
| i: title page | i: title page | ||
| Line 38: | Line 40: | ||
| p1: Chapter 1 Introduction | p1: Chapter 1 Introduction | ||
| - | * node, edge, graph => ask the audience to illustrate some graphs | + | * node, edge, relations, graph => ask the audience to illustrate some graphs |
| - | * Zachary Karate Club Network (1977) | + | * Zachary Karate Club Network (1977) |
| + | |||
| + | p2: | ||
| + | * It mentioned "a dramatic increase in the quantity and quality of graph data in the last 25 years." | ||
| + | * ML is not the only way but may be interesting. | ||
| + | * adjacency matrix, adjacency list, simple graph and {0,1} | ||
| + | * (optional) graph processing from adjacency list to adjacency matrix seems an evidence showing human consumes matter and energy to increase its order. | ||
| + | |||
| + | p3: | ||
| + | * multi-graph (variable number of types/ | ||
| + | * Heterogeneous graph (inner edges important than inter edges), multipartite graph (no inner edges, only inter edges), multiplex graph (inter edges important than inner edges) | ||
| + | * attribute or feature | ||
| + | |||
| + | p4: | ||
| + | * graph (abstract structure) and network (real-world data) | ||
| + | * supervised (predict an output) and unsupervised (infer pattern) | ||
| + | * node classification: | ||
| + | |||
| + | p5: | ||
| + | * applications: | ||
| + | * difference from a standard supervised learning: the assumption/ | ||
| + | * popular inductive bias used in graph learning: homophily (same attrubute with neighbors), structural equivalence (similar local structure -> similar label), heterophily (e.g., gender). | ||
| + | |||
| + | p6: | ||
| + | * supervised learning and semi-supervised learning, and GL (no iid assumption) | ||
| + | * relation prediction: e.g., recommendation system, side-effect. Notice the requirement of inductive bias. | ||
| + | |||
| + | p7: | ||
| + | * clustering and community detection | ||
| + | * graph classification, | ||
| + | |||
| + | p8: | ||
| + | * iid assumption and why? -> Li-Yang | ||
| + | * Additional comment: Causal relation and correlation. ML is often consider the latter approach but actually we need to consider the former. | ||
public/grl_readingmemo.1712211047.txt.gz · Last modified: by liang
