public:grl_readingmemo
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
public:grl_readingmemo [2024/04/04 15:17] – liang | public:grl_readingmemo [2024/04/04 16:12] (current) – liang | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
===== #01, liangz ===== | ===== #01, liangz ===== | ||
- | range: from the title page to p8 (end of Chapter 1) | + | range: from the title page to p8 (end of Chapter 1). |
+ | |||
+ | ** NOTICE: ** please read both the scanned pictures and this memo. | ||
i: title page | i: title page | ||
Line 42: | Line 44: | ||
p2: | p2: | ||
- | * It mentioned "a dramatic increase in the quantity and quality of graph data in the last 25 years." | + | * It mentioned "a dramatic increase in the quantity and quality of graph data in the last 25 years." |
* ML is not the only way but may be interesting. | * ML is not the only way but may be interesting. | ||
* adjacency matrix, adjacency list, simple graph and {0,1} | * adjacency matrix, adjacency list, simple graph and {0,1} | ||
- | * (optional) graph processing from adjacency list to adjacency matrix seems an evidence showing human consumes matter and energy to increase | + | * (optional) graph processing from adjacency list to adjacency matrix seems an evidence showing human consumes matter and energy to increase |
+ | |||
+ | p3: | ||
+ | * multi-graph (variable number of types/ | ||
+ | * Heterogeneous graph (inner edges important than inter edges), multipartite graph (no inner edges, only inter edges), multiplex graph (inter edges important than inner edges) | ||
+ | * attribute or feature | ||
+ | |||
+ | p4: | ||
+ | * graph (abstract structure) and network (real-world data) | ||
+ | * supervised (predict an output) and unsupervised (infer pattern) | ||
+ | * node classification: | ||
+ | |||
+ | p5: | ||
+ | * applications: | ||
+ | * difference from a standard supervised learning: the assumption/ | ||
+ | * popular inductive bias used in graph learning: homophily (same attrubute with neighbors), structural equivalence (similar local structure -> similar label), heterophily (e.g., gender). | ||
+ | |||
+ | p6: | ||
+ | * supervised learning and semi-supervised learning, and GL (no iid assumption) | ||
+ | * relation prediction: e.g., recommendation system, side-effect. Notice the requirement of inductive bias. | ||
+ | |||
+ | p7: | ||
+ | * clustering and community detection | ||
+ | * graph classification, | ||
+ | |||
+ | p8: | ||
+ | * iid assumption and why? -> Li-Yang | ||
+ | * Additional comment: Causal relation and correlation. ML is often consider the latter approach but actually we need to consider the former. |
public/grl_readingmemo.1712211430.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/04 15:17 by liang